Main report · Jul 2025 – Jun 2026
Upwork Automation Market Analysis
June 2026 focus, twelve-month trends. Platform set (jobs naming Zapier / n8n / Make.com). Rates and share are comparable across the whole series; absolute counts changed basis in May 2026 — see the note in Overview.
Overview
June 2026 is the second month on the current measurement basis, and the first that gives us a like-for-like read on it. The platform set — jobs naming Zapier, n8n, or Make.com — held at 1,795 jobs, essentially flat against May's 1,730. Absolute counts are not comparable across the May-2026 measurement change, so the honest signal here is not volume; it's the rate, the platform mix, and the AI picture, all of which are capture-independent. On those, June looks calm.
The through-line stories are trend lines, not turning points: the median hourly rate held at $35/hr, where it has sat in 11 of the last 12 months. The mean drifted to $41.83/hr (from May's $42.20), still inside the narrow $38–43 band the series has occupied all year — not a floor, not a re-basing, just the mean wobbling on a handful of high postings. GoHighLevel remained the dominant single application at 483 jobs, holding its May level (476) and staying the most durable specialization in the dataset. The three major platforms held their standing structure: Zapier the volume leader (972), n8n the technical-depth option (815), Make.com the weakest (593).
On contract type, fixed-price work was 40.1% of jobs (720 of 1,795 jobs with a contract type), down slightly from May's 42.9% but consistent with the year's slow, real drift toward defined-deliverable engagements. And the AI picture — tracked here for a second month — continues to dominate: within the platform set, OpenAI/GPT (469) and Claude/Anthropic (464) each appear in roughly a quarter of jobs, with AI Agents (326) and RAG (266) both material.
Key June Insight: The calm story is the story. Median pay is flat, the platform mix is stable, and the only genuinely accelerating signal is AI. Do not read the flat-to-May counts as a market event — they're a measurement basis, not a trend. What's worth acting on is the standing structure: a $35 median, a slow shift to fixed-price, durable CRM demand, and AI now in the majority of automation work.
Platforms — Twelve-Month Trends
Major Automation Platforms
Note on counts: The May-2026 measurement change means absolute counts before and after that boundary are not on the same basis. The pre-May columns are shown for continuity only; the comparable read is May 2026 → June 2026 and the platform share mix.
| Platform | Jul'25 | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan'26 | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | May→Jun MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | 2,796 | 2,663 | 2,233 | 2,132 | 1,662 | 1,753 | 1,767 | 1,721 | 1,827 | 1,785 | 1,021 | 972 | 📉 -4.8% |
| n8n | 1,984 | 2,155 | 2,099 | 2,024 | 1,729 | 1,663 | 1,535 | 1,403 | 1,465 | 1,252 | 805 | 815 | 🟢 +1.2% |
| Make.com | 1,429 | 1,174 | 967 | 1,027 | 811 | 751 | 725 | 743 | 806 | 781 | 638 | 593 | 📉 -7.1% |
| Power Automate | 28 | 47 | 33 | 42 | 20 | 28 | 37 | 22 | 29 | 30 | 20 | 18 | 📉 -10.0% |
Status Indicators:
- 🚀 Strong Growth (>10%)
- 🟢 Stable/Growth (0-10%)
- 🟡 Slight Decline (0-5%)
- 📉 Declining (>5%)
- 💥 Collapse (>20% since June 2025 baseline, sustained)
Platform Analysis
Zapier (Volume Leader)
- Current: 972 jobs (40.7% of platform mentions)
- Trend: -4.8% MoM vs May — a one-month move on the current basis, not a signal
- Assessment: Zapier remains the volume leader on the current basis, as it has been for essentially the entire series. The month-over-month wobble is noise; the standing structure is unchanged.
- Recommendation: Primary platform for breadth; the volume cushion is real, but specialization matters more than platform choice.
n8n (Technical-Depth Option)
- Current: 815 jobs (34.1% of platform mentions)
- Trend: +1.2% MoM, effectively flat against May's 805
- Assessment: n8n is the technical-depth option, not a "uniquely resilient" platform — that thesis was a baseline artifact. Over the full series all three platforms declined roughly the same from their peaks.
- Recommendation: Choose n8n for self-hosted and custom-development work where technical depth commands a premium; pair with a CRM or AI specialty.
Make.com (Weakest of the Three)
- Current: 593 jobs (24.8% of platform mentions)
- Trend: -7.1% MoM vs May
- Assessment: Make.com remains the smallest and weakest of the three, with the deepest decline from peak. This is standing structure, not this month's news.
- Recommendation: Secondary platform; do not over-allocate to it as a primary specialization.
Power Automate (Niche)
- Current: 18 jobs
- Trend: -10.0% MoM on tiny numbers
- Assessment: Too small to read month-to-month; a niche enterprise tool throughout the series.
- Recommendation: Microsoft enterprise ecosystem only.
Application Ecosystem
Top 15 Applications by Job Volume
Note on counts: Same measurement-basis caveat applies — the comparable read is May → June. Pre-May columns are for continuity.
| Application | Jul'25 | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan'26 | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | May→Jun MoM | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoHighLevel | 682 | 647 | 662 | 659 | 579 | 562 | 645 | 585 | 693 | 687 | 476 | 483 | 🟢 +1.5% | Dominant application |
| Airtable | 916 | 731 | 604 | 611 | 505 | 492 | 467 | 424 | 435 | 447 | 308 | 266 | 📉 -13.6% | Continued softening |
| Google Sheets | 984 | 815 | 719 | 726 | 597 | 552 | 537 | 495 | 526 | 532 | 313 | 261 | 📉 -16.6% | Continued softening |
| HubSpot | 412 | 490 | 450 | 447 | 346 | 333 | 350 | 349 | 375 | 378 | 205 | 243 | 🚀 +18.5% | Rebound MoM |
| Excel | 602 | 626 | 549 | 568 | 403 | 382 | 316 | 280 | 251 | 235 | 108 | 171 | 🚀 +58.3% | Small-number bounce |
| Slack | 625 | 519 | 460 | 461 | 354 | 321 | 307 | 316 | 336 | 323 | 218 | 157 | 📉 -28.0% | Pullback |
| Notion | 592 | 483 | 325 | 414 | 321 | 341 | 273 | 243 | 229 | 230 | 157 | 111 | 📉 -29.3% | Pullback |
| ClickUp | 251 | 199 | 166 | 182 | 135 | 169 | 146 | 134 | 112 | 103 | 58 | 81 | 🚀 +39.7% | Small-number bounce |
| QuickBooks | 108 | 123 | 93 | 95 | 79 | 64 | 77 | 73 | 94 | 95 | 47 | 70 | 🚀 +48.9% | Small-number bounce |
| Zoho | 175 | 163 | 124 | 141 | 128 | 122 | 82 | 120 | 101 | 119 | 41 | 66 | 🚀 +61.0% | Small-number bounce |
| Salesforce | 110 | 146 | 149 | 106 | 81 | 96 | 88 | 110 | 88 | 102 | 57 | 64 | 🚀 +12.3% | Small-number rise |
| Monday.com | 141 | 125 | 98 | 97 | 101 | 90 | 102 | 101 | 104 | 111 | 60 | 49 | 📉 -18.3% | Pullback |
| Asana | 92 | 100 | 93 | 97 | 67 | 71 | 64 | 65 | 49 | 72 | 27 | 24 | 📉 -11.1% | Small-number decline |
| Xero | 60 | 58 | 43 | 51 | 40 | 34 | 30 | 37 | 43 | 42 | 17 | 20 | 🚀 +17.6% | Small-number rise |
| Trello | 94 | 78 | 75 | 55 | 48 | 47 | 26 | 24 | 31 | 41 | 11 | 17 | 🚀 +54.5% | Near-extinct, tiny numbers |
Read the small-number moves with caution. Several of the largest MoM percentages (Zoho +61%, Excel +58%, Trello +55%, QuickBooks +49%, ClickUp +40%) sit on double-digit or low-double-digit counts, where a handful of postings swings the percentage hard. Treat these as noise until a second month confirms direction.
Dedicated CRM Systems
| CRM | May 2026 | June 2026 | May→Jun | Market Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoHighLevel | 476 | 483 | +1.5% | Dominant CRM, holding its level |
| HubSpot | 205 | 243 | +18.5% | Rebound MoM, second-largest CRM |
| Zoho | 41 | 66 | +61.0% | Small-number bounce, volatile all year |
| Salesforce | 57 | 64 | +12.3% | Small-number rise |
Key Insight: GoHighLevel remains the standout. It held near its level (+1.5% MoM) and has been the most durable single application in the entire dataset. HubSpot's +18.5% is a real rebound but sits on counts small enough that one month doesn't confirm a trend — HubSpot has been steady, not surging, across the year. The Zoho and Salesforce moves are the kind of small-number CRM "rotation" that reads as drama but is mostly noise; pick a CRM and go deep rather than chasing last month's arrow. GoHighLevel-for-agencies is the best-supported specialization call here.
Generic "CRM" Mentions
| Month | Mentions | Change |
|---|---|---|
| May 2026 | 817 | Current-basis baseline |
| June 2026 | 808 | -1.1% MoM |
Generic CRM mentions held essentially flat at 808 (-1.1% MoM). CRM demand as a category is stable on the current basis — it moved less than the platform set overall, consistent with CRM being the most durable sub-category across the year.
Alternative CRM Solutions
| Application | May 2026 | June 2026 | May→Jun | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtable | 308 | 266 | -13.6% | Continued softening |
| Notion | 157 | 111 | -29.3% | Pullback |
| ClickUp | 58 | 81 | +39.7% | Small-number bounce |
| Monday.com | 60 | 49 | -18.3% | Pullback |
Combined Alternative CRMs: 507 jobs (June) vs 583 jobs (May) = -13.0%
Insight: On the current basis, the alternative-CRM category softened month-over-month while dedicated CRMs held or grew. That is consistent with the year-long pattern: dedicated CRM demand — especially GoHighLevel — is more durable than the project-management-tool-as-CRM alternatives. ClickUp's bounce is a small-number move; don't read it as a category reversal.
Market Trends
Hourly rate evolution
Median (the anchor) and average across the tracked history.
Platform mix (share %)
Share cancels the scrape-basis change — the honest read of the mix.
AI mentions — Jun 2026 only
Keyword mentions inside this month's platform jobs (not cumulative).
This is the second month AI keywords have been tracked, so this is a level read, not a trend. Two populations matter and must be kept separate:
- Platform set — jobs in this report's canonical dataset (jobs naming Zapier/n8n/Make.com, 1,795 jobs). Shows AI adoption within platform automation work.
- Broad automation set — a wider net of automation jobs (3,756 jobs) used only for the AI picture.
| AI Category | Platform set (of 1,795) | Broad set (of 3,756) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI/GPT | 469 (26.1%) | 559 (14.9%) |
| Claude/Anthropic | 464 (25.8%) | 651 (17.3%) |
| AI Agents | 326 (18.2%) | 458 (12.2%) |
| RAG | 266 (14.8%) | 403 (10.7%) |
| Voice AI | 192 (10.7%) | 254 (6.8%) |
| Vector DBs | 59 (3.3%) | 63 (1.7%) |
| LangChain/LangGraph | 54 (3.0%) | 60 (1.6%) |
| MCP | 54 (3.0%) | 83 (2.2%) |
| AI Builders | 40 (2.2%) | 43 (1.1%) |
| Embeddings | 12 (0.7%) | 15 (0.4%) |
Key Insight: AI is concentrated in the platform set. Within platform-automation work, OpenAI/GPT (26.1%) and Claude/Anthropic (25.8%) each appear in roughly a quarter of jobs, and AI Agents (18.2%) and RAG (14.8%) are both material. Across the broader automation market the shares are lower but still substantial — AI is present, not niche. The premium is in building, not mentioning: the highest-rate June postings are agent builds, RAG systems, and Claude/agentic engineering, not generic "add some AI" jobs. Two months is not yet a trend, but the level alone confirms AI is now table stakes for platform automation work rather than a specialty tier.
Volume
Volume Trends (current basis):
- May 2026: 1,730 jobs
- June 2026: 1,795 jobs (+3.8% MoM)
Assessment: Volume was essentially flat month-over-month on the current basis. Absolute counts are not comparable across the May-2026 measurement change — the current platform-set counts sit well below the pre-May figures because the scrape captures a somewhat narrower slice, not because the market shrank. Do not read the level as a contraction or a new baseline. The comparable, capture-independent signals are the rate and the platform mix, and both were calm this month. Since the clean June 2025 baseline, the broad direction across the full year has been a gradual drift lower in volume — a trend confirmed over many months, distinct from this month's flat print.
Rates
Lead with the median — it's the capture-independent signal.
| Month | Median Rate | Mean Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | $30.00 | $37.58 |
| Jan 2026 | $35.00 | $40.20 |
| Feb 2026 | $35.00 | $43.27 |
| Mar 2026 | $35.00 | $40.66 |
| Apr 2026 | $35.00 | $39.46 |
| May 2026 | $38.00 | $42.20 |
| June 2026 | $35.00 | $41.83 |
Analysis: The median hourly rate held at $35/hr, where it has sat in 11 of the last 12 months. That is the honest headline: the typical automation job pays $35/hr and has all year. The mean drifted to $41.83/hr (-0.9% from May's $42.20), which keeps it inside the narrow $38–43 band the mean has occupied throughout the series. Do not call this a floor, a re-basing, or a shift — the mean is easily levered by a handful of high postings, and one month of movement is noise. The 25th percentile sits at $20/hr and the 75th at $50/hr, which is the same wide distribution seen all year: a large low-end, a thin high-end, and a $35 median in the middle.
High-paying jobs ($75+): 82 (up from May's 67, but on the current narrower basis; not comparable to the pre-May counts of 139–170). Ultra-premium ($150+): 8 jobs. Max rate: $250/hr. Premium work exists but is scarce — win it with proof, not positioning.
Contract Type
| Month | Fixed-Price Share | Hourly Share |
|---|---|---|
| May 2026 | 42.9% | 57.1% |
| June 2026 | 40.1% | 59.9% |
Assessment: Fixed-price work was 40.1% of jobs in June (720 fixed vs 679 hourly), down slightly from May's 42.9%. The month-to-month wiggle is not the story — the multi-month drift toward fixed-price scoping is. Across the year the fixed-price share has risen steadily from the high-20s to the high-30s/low-40s, and that is a real trend, not noise. Combined with a flat $35 median hourly rate, this is the strongest concrete case for outcome/package pricing: clients are increasingly scoping automation as defined deliverables rather than open-ended hourly engagements.
Compensation
Sample: 679 jobs with a posted hourly rate · fixed-price share 40.1%.
June 2026 Rate Breakdown
| Tier | Rate Range | Jobs Available | Requirements | Market Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra-Premium | $150-250/hr | 8 jobs | AI/Claude + agent architecture + industry | Thin, AI-concentrated |
| Premium | $100-150/hr | 34 jobs | Multi-platform + CRM + AI integration | Stable |
| Expert | $75-100/hr | 40 jobs | Platform certified + CRM + proven results | Stable |
| Experienced | $50-75/hr | 122 jobs | Multi-platform competency | Steady |
| Mid-Tier | $40-50/hr | 112 jobs | Single platform proficiency | Steady |
| Entry | $25-40/hr | 189 jobs | Basic automation tasks | Largest bucket |
Key Insight: The premium tiers are small in absolute terms this month—8 ultra-premium and 34 premium jobs—but note the caveat: these are platform-set counts on a narrower capture than the 2025 series, so don't read them as a collapse from Aaron's earlier figures. The relevant shape is that entry ($25-40) remains the single largest bucket at 189 jobs, the median hourly rate is $35, and the p25/p75 spread runs $20 to $50. The typical automation job on Upwork still pays modestly. The premium tier is a specialist niche layered on top of that reality, not the center of gravity.
Average Rate Evolution
| Month | Market Average | Median | High-Paying Count ($75+) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2025 | $39.61/hr | $35 | — | Peak volume |
| Aug 2025 | $39.07/hr | $35 | — | Steady |
| Sep 2025 | $38.74/hr | $35 | — | Steady |
| Oct 2025 | $38.17/hr | $35 | — | Steady |
| Nov 2025 | $38.79/hr | $35 | — | Steady |
| Dec 2025 | $37.58/hr | $30 | 144 | Low mean |
| Jan 2026 | $40.20/hr | $35 | 165 | Q1 lift |
| Feb 2026 | $43.27/hr | $35 | 170 | Mean outlier |
| Mar 2026 | $40.66/hr | $35 | 167 | Reverted |
| Apr 2026 | $39.46/hr | $35 | 139 | In-band |
| May 2026 | $42.20/hr | $38 | 67 | New basis |
| Jun 2026 | $41.83/hr | $35 | 82 | Flat median |
Analysis: Lead with the median, because it's the honest signal and it's capture-independent across the May measurement change. The median hourly rate is $35 in June—right where it has been almost the entire series. The average of $41.83 sits inside the $38-41 band the mean has held all year (February's $43.27 remains the one outlier that reverted immediately). May's $38 median was a one-month tick; June is back at $35. Don't read a trend into either move—both are noise until a second month confirms. The picture across a full year is a flat typical rate with a mean that wobbles in a narrow band.
High-Paying Opportunities
Profile Requirements
Technical Stack:
- Claude/OpenAI API mastery (agentic systems, tool use, production deployment)
- AI agent architecture (multi-step reasoning, memory, orchestration)
- n8n or Make.com for workflow orchestration
- RAG and vector database work (retrieval systems, embeddings)
- Custom development (Python, TypeScript, Node.js)
Industry Knowledge:
- Real estate / commercial brokerage (AI intelligence platforms, prospecting agents)
- Legal / continuing education (RAG search over large document catalogs)
- Home services / home improvement (systems integration across disconnected stacks)
- Financial services / bookkeeping (extraction, reconciliation, SBA lending pipelines)
- Agricultural supply chain / commodity trading (operations platform architecture)
Proven Track Record:
- Production AI agent deployments, not just API integration
- Documented business outcomes
- Active technical presence (GitHub, content)
- Comfort teaching/mentoring senior clients through builds
June Market Reality
Ultra-premium opportunities were thin in absolute terms (8 jobs at $150+/hr) and heavily concentrated in AI work. The top-rate June postings cluster around Claude, AI agents, and RAG systems. The pattern matches what the AI-tier data shows: within the platform set, AI keywords are pervasive, and the highest-rate roles are AI-native builds rather than platform-only implementation.
Entry Barrier: Very high—the top-rate roles want production agent experience and, in several cases, someone who can teach the client to build. Generic AI-enhanced automation sits lower in the stack; standalone agent architecture is what commands $150-250/hr.
Actual June Examples
Example 1: AI Agent & Workflow Build for Real Estate Agent
- Rate: $250/hr
- Requirements: Perplexity + Claude specialist, prospecting agent build, property-data extraction
- Project: NYC real estate agent setting up prospecting and workflow agents to search and record homeowner/transaction data
- Context: AI agent architecture for a solo operator—the ceiling is agent-building, not platform work
Example 2: Claude Code Coach & Agentic AI Trainer
- Rate: $250/hr
- Requirements: Deep hands-on Claude Code production experience, ability to teach and sequence real projects
- Project: Founder of a 26-year commercial real estate brokerage spinning out an AI intelligence platform; wants a teacher alongside a fractional CTO and senior builder
- Context: Teaching/mentoring premium—clients will pay top rate for someone who can transfer agent-building skill, not just deliver
Example 3: AI Agents Builder — Build & Earn Recurring Revenue
- Rate: $200/hr
- Requirements: Autonomous AI agent development, performance-based delivery
- Project: Marketplace operator handling customers while builders ship autonomous agents on a per-delivery basis
- Context: Agent-building as productized, recurring work—a different commercial model at the top of the market
Example 4: N8N Automation Specialist with API Expertise
- Rate: $200/hr
- Requirements: n8n + AI agent and workflow development, API depth
- Project: AI consulting company embedding AI agents and automation directly into client operations
- Context: n8n's premium positioning persists at the top of the rate stack when paired with agent work
Example 5: Systems Integration, AI, & Automation Developer
- Rate: $200/hr
- Requirements: Connect a disconnected software stack, automate manual work, build usable reporting
- Project: 30-year family-owned home improvement company in Michigan, project-based contract work
- Context: Traditional systems-integration work still commands premium when scoped around AI and reporting outcomes
Profile Requirements
Core Competencies:
- Deep expertise in one platform + working knowledge of a second
- CRM specialization (GoHighLevel is the volume leader among CRMs; HubSpot steady)
- AI integration (production API work, RAG, agent design)
- Industry-specific positioning
- Strategic consulting beyond implementation
Differentiators:
- Case studies with quantified ROI
- Platform certifications (n8n, HubSpot, Salesforce, GoHighLevel)
- Visible thought leadership
- Proprietary frameworks or templates
- Strong client references and repeat business
June High-Demand Segments
1. AI / Claude Agent Engineering ($100-250/hr)
Opportunity: AI keywords are pervasive across the platform set—Claude/Anthropic (464 mentions), OpenAI/GPT (469), AI Agents (326), RAG (266)
Skills Needed:
- Claude API mastery (tool use, agentic systems, memory)
- OpenAI API and prompt engineering
- RAG architecture and vector databases
- Production deployment (latency, reliability, cost)
- One orchestration platform (n8n, Make.com, Zapier)
Why Premium: The June top-rate examples are dominated by AI agent and Claude work. This is where the ceiling is. Generic AI-enhanced workflows sit at $75-100; standalone agent architecture and RAG systems reach $120-250.
2. GoHighLevel Growth Systems ($100-150/hr)
Opportunity: 483 GoHighLevel mentions—the leading CRM by volume in the platform set
Skills Needed:
- GoHighLevel platform mastery (workflows, CRM, funnels)
- n8n or Zapier for external integrations
- WhatsApp and multi-channel messaging
- AI overlay for lead handling and qualification
- Agency workflow consulting
Why Premium: June's $150/hr "Senior Growth Systems Operator" role paired GoHighLevel, WhatsApp, and AI for a university student-acquisition engine. GoHighLevel remains the most durable CRM specialization in this dataset, and pairing it with AI pushes it into the premium tier.
3. RAG & AI Search Systems ($120-150/hr)
Opportunity: RAG appears 266 times in the platform set; the broader automation market shows 403 RAG mentions across 3,756 jobs
Skills Needed:
- Retrieval-augmented generation architecture
- Vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, Qdrant)
- Embeddings and search relevance
- Large-document ingestion and transcript handling
- Production search UX
Why Premium: June's $150/hr legal-education RAG role is representative—clients with large content catalogs building AI search need genuine retrieval expertise, not just an LLM API call. This is an emerging premium niche.
4. Multi-Platform + CRM Integration ($100-130/hr)
Opportunity: CRM mentions at 808 in the platform set; Airtable (266), HubSpot (243), Salesforce (64), Zoho (66) all present
Skills Needed:
- Deep expertise in one CRM
- Middleware and API orchestration (Make.com, n8n)
- Data quality and reconciliation
- Industry-specific configuration
- Reporting integration
Why Premium: June's $120/hr Make.com + Gemini + Airtable middleware retainer and the $125/hr HubSpot AI-outreach rebuild show that integration work scoped around AI enrichment and reporting still commands premium rates.
Profile Requirements
Core Skills:
- Deep expertise in one platform OR competency in two
- 50+ completed automations
- Industry-specific knowledge
- Project management capability
Minimum Credentials:
- 10+ client references
- Platform certification
- Public portfolio with case studies
Resilient Segments
1. Accounting & Bookkeeping Automation ($75-100/hr)
Opportunity: QuickBooks (70 mentions), Xero (20), plus AI-bookkeeping and extraction roles
Focus:
- QuickBooks + Make.com/Zapier integration
- Document extraction and reconciliation (see June's $125/hr AI/OCR tax-return and $125/hr AI-bookkeeping MVP roles)
- Invoice and payment processing
- Financial reporting automation
Why Growing: Accounting automation delivers measurable ROI, and June shows several AI-extraction bookkeeping builds. Pair QuickBooks with document-extraction skill.
2. CRM Implementation ($75-100/hr)
Opportunity: GoHighLevel (483), HubSpot (243), Salesforce (64), Zoho (66)
Focus:
- HubSpot configuration and onboarding
- GoHighLevel agency setup
- Salesforce admin and customization
- CRM data migration
Why Stable: CRM demand is the most durable sub-segment in this dataset over a full year. Even a bare implementation earns solid expert-tier rates.
3. Airtable & Systems-of-Record Builds ($75-100/hr)
Opportunity: Airtable at 266 mentions, plus Monday.com architect roles
Focus:
- Airtable as operational backbone
- Interconnected board/base design (see June's $150/hr Monday.com music-label architect role)
- Integration with automation platforms
- Reporting layers
Why Stable: Operational-database work is steady, and clients building a system-of-record will pay expert rates for durable architecture.
4. Zapier Advanced Implementation ($75-100/hr)
Opportunity: Zapier at 972 mentions—the volume leader in the platform set
Focus:
- Complex multi-step workflows
- Error handling and monitoring
- Zapier for Teams deployment
- Migration from legacy automation
Why Relevant: Zapier remains the highest-volume platform. Steady flow of advanced implementation work for those who go deep.
Recommendations & Outlook
Platform Strategy for Q3 2026
1. Zapier: Volume Leader
- 972 jobs, the largest of the three on the current basis
- Recommendation: Primary platform for breadth. Standing structure, not a monthly call.
2. n8n: Technical-Depth Option
- 815 jobs, effectively flat MoM
- Recommendation: Choose for self-hosted/custom work; pair with a CRM or AI specialty. Do not treat as "uniquely resilient" — all three platforms declined similarly from peak.
3. Make.com: Weakest of the Three
- 593 jobs, the smallest and most-declined platform
- Recommendation: Secondary skill, not a primary specialization.
4. Ignore the platform horse-race. Zapier leads on volume, n8n is the depth option, Make is the weakest — pick based on the clients you want, not on last month's growth arrow.
Application Strategy
High-Value Specializations:
-
CRM + Automation Specialist ($75-150/hr)
- GoHighLevel at 483, the dominant single application and the most durable specialization in the dataset
- HubSpot steady as the second-largest CRM; generic CRM demand stable
- This is the single best-supported specialization call.
-
AI Agent / RAG Engineering ($100-250/hr)
- June's top rates are agent builds, RAG systems, and Claude/agentic engineering
- The premium is in building production systems, not mentioning AI
-
Voice AI ($75-150/hr)
- Present in ~11% of platform-set jobs; a coherent emerging niche
-
Accounting Automation ($60-120/hr)
- QuickBooks and Xero present but on small counts; steady rather than surging
Avoid/Deprioritize:
- Generalist platform-only positioning: the market rewards a CRM or AI specialty
- Chasing the small-number app bounces (Zoho, Trello, ClickUp) as if they were trends
- Entry-tier ($20-40/hr) generalist work: it's the market's gravity, not an escape from it
Rate Strategy for Q3 2026
Current Market (current basis):
- Median: $35.00/hr (flat, the honest headline)
- Mean: $41.83/hr (inside the year's $38–43 band)
- 25th/75th percentile: $20 / $50
- High-paying ($75+): 82 jobs; Ultra-premium ($150+): 8 jobs; Max: $250/hr
Positioning:
- Entry: $20-35/hr (the market's gravity; hard to escape without a real specialty)
- Experienced: $50/hr (75th percentile; requires specialization)
- Specialist: $75-130/hr (CRM + platform, or AI build work)
- Premium: $130-250/hr (AI agent architecture, RAG, agentic/Claude engineering)
Key: The typical job pays $35/hr. Escaping that requires a real specialization — CRM depth or production AI-building — not a repositioning statement. And given the steady shift to fixed-price work, quote defined outcomes rather than hourly hand-wringing.
The Premium Positioning Formula (Q3 2026)
1. CRM Foundation (Choose One):
- GoHighLevel: Leading CRM (483 mentions), agency/growth focus, $100-150/hr
- HubSpot: Steady (243 mentions), enterprise, $90-140/hr
- QuickBooks: Accounting niche with AI-extraction overlay, $75-125/hr
2. Platform Proficiency:
- Option A: Zapier (volume leader, breadth)
- Option B: n8n (technical depth, premium AI pairing)
- Option C: Both (flexibility across bids)
3. AI Capabilities (Now the Ceiling):
- Claude/OpenAI API mastery (production agents, not just chat)
- RAG and vector databases (emerging premium niche)
- Voice AI (Vapi/Retell)—still emerging
- Agent orchestration and tool use
4. Proof and Positioning:
- 3+ case studies with quantified ROI
- Industry-specific portfolio
- Active thought leadership
- Package/value-based pricing
Formula Result: $100-250/hr sustainable rates for AI-native specialists; solid $75-100 for CRM + platform experts
The Bottom Line
June 2026 is a calm month on the numbers that matter, and calm is worth saying plainly.
The numbers:
- Median hourly rate flat at $35 (11 of the last 12 months)
- Average $41.83, inside the year-long $38-41 band
- 82 jobs at $75+/hr in the platform set
- 8 ultra-premium and 34 premium jobs
- Max rate $250/hr—AI agent and Claude work
- Fixed-price share at 40.1%
Thriving Segments:
- AI/Claude agent engineering ($120-250/hr)—the premium ceiling
- RAG and AI search systems ($120-150/hr)—emerging niche
- GoHighLevel growth systems ($100-150/hr)—most durable CRM specialty
- Accounting extraction automation ($75-125/hr)
Struggling Segments:
- Platform-only positioning without CRM or AI overlay
- Low-volume tool specialties (Trello, Jira, Asana)
- Sub-$40 generalist work—the largest bucket, and the gravity to escape
Don't read the lower absolute counts as a market decline; that's a measurement change. Read the median ($35, flat) and the platform mix (Zapier volume, n8n depth, Make weakest) and the fixed-price drift (40%). Those are the real signals. The premium tier is real, it pays well, and it lives in AI agent work—there just isn't a lot of it, and you win it with proof, not positioning language.
Flat median. Range-bound average. AI agent work as the ceiling. CRM as the most durable specialty. Package your work.
What to Watch (July–September)
- Volume: Read only like-for-like on the current basis; ignore any comparison across the May-2026 measurement change
- Median rate: Expect $35/hr to hold; treat any single-month mean move as noise until a second month confirms
- Contract type: Watch whether the fixed-price share continues its multi-month climb — the real signal for package pricing
- GoHighLevel: The most durable specialization; watch it hold its level as confirmation of agency-CRM demand
- AI tier: A third month will let us start reading direction rather than just level; today AI is table stakes, not a niche
- Platform mix: Zapier leads, n8n is the depth play, Make the weakest — expect standing structure, not a monthly reshuffle
Market Structure (honest read)
What the data actually shows:
- A flat $35 median hourly rate — the typical job hasn't moved all year
- A mean drifting in a narrow $38–43 band, levered by a thin high end
- A slow, real shift toward fixed-price scoping (high-20s → ~40% over the year)
- Durable CRM demand, led by GoHighLevel
- AI in roughly a quarter of platform-automation jobs — the clearest emerging signal
- All three platforms down roughly the same from peak; no horse-race, no uniquely resilient winner
What that means for a consultant: Plan for a flat-pay, specialization-rewarding market. Take the CRM bet (GoHighLevel) or the AI-building bet (agents/RAG), package your work as defined outcomes, and ignore the monthly platform arrows.